Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Abhay Kumar Singh Chauhan @ Futo Singh, Son of Late Hari Prasad Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of conviction and arrest (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. defense arguments regarding recovery evidence (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. prosecution claims and witness testimonies (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. legal precedent on evidence requirements (Para 10) |
| 5. reasons for appeal decision and legal conclusion (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. order discharging appellant and concluding the case (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
JUDGMENT :
PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 06.06.2006 and 07.06.2006 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C-IV, Deoghar in S.T. No.12(B) of 2001/23 of 2006 whereby and whereunder, the sole appellant has been held guilty for the offence under section 25(1-B)(a) and 26 of ARMS ACT and sentenced to undergo R.I. of 2 years with fine of Rs.2,000/- for each of the offences with the default stipulation. Both the sentences have been directed to run concurrently. The appellant has been acquitted from the charges under sections 399 and 402 of INDIAN PENAL CODE .
FACTUAL MATRIX
2. Factual matrix giving rise to this appeal is that on 09.10.2000 at about 11:55 PM, while S.I. J.K. Singh, the then Officer-in- Char
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
