Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, RAJESH KUMAR
Junu Soy S/o Late Samu Soy – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The instant appeal is directed against the Judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 15.12.1998, passed by learned District & Sessions Judge, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa, in Sessions Trial No.72 of 1998, arising out of Chaibasa Muffasil P.S. Case No.127 of 1997 (G.R. Case No.540 of 1997), registered under Sections 302/ 201/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code by which both the appellants have been convicted under Sections 302/ 201 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and have been directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life for the offence under Section 302 I.P.C.
Factual Matrix
2. This Court, before proceeding to examine the legality and propriety of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence, deems it fit and proper to refer the background of institution of prosecution case.
3. The prosecution story in brief as per the allegation made in the First Information Report reads as hereunder.
4. According to prosecution case, as given in the First Information Report (F.I.R.) (Ext.2), in short, is that on the alleged date of occurrence i.e. 7/10/97, the informant's son Lalu Soy left the house from village Diliamarcha and stated to his father that he was going to the garage o
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
