Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, ARUN KUMAR RAI
Birendra Choubey, S/o Somnath Choubey – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.
1. Heard Mr. Anurag Prasad, learned counsel for the appellant and Mrs. Priya Shrestha, learned Special P.P.
2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 15.09.2000 passed by Sri Ghanshayam Prasad, learned Sessions Judge, Palamau at Daltonganj in S.T. No. 229/1999 whereby and whereunder, the appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 304B IPC and has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life.
3. The prosecution case arises out of a written report of Ramjee Dubey, in which it has been stated that the sister of the informant, namely, Gayatri Devi, was married to Birendra Choubey (appellant) in the year 1995. Despite being given dowry at the time of the marriage, the husband and in-laws of the sister of the informant made a demand of further dowry of T.V., chain, etc. It has been alleged that after a week of the marriage, when the sister of the informant returned to her parental house, she complained of not being properly treated and made a request not to send her back. However, after much persuasion and by fulfilling a part of the demand, the sister of the informant returned
The prosecution must provide clear evidence to support a dowry death conviction, which was not met in this case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the accused can be convicted under Section 304B IPC and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act if the prosecution proves that the deceased w....
The court affirmed that dowry death can be established through evidence of demand and torture, even if not immediately preceding death, under IPC Sections 498-A and 304-B.
The court emphasized the necessity of reliable evidence for conviction in dowry death cases, ruling that the prosecution failed to prove essential elements under IPC Sections 304B and 306.
Dowry death conviction under IPC Section 304B requires proof of cruelty/harassment for dowry demand soon before death to attract Evidence Act Section 113B presumption; mere presence at scene insuffic....
The main legal point established is the requirement for evidence of dowry demand just before the death in cases of dowry death under Section 304 (B) of the Indian Penal Code.
In dowry death cases, prosecution must prove unnatural death within seven years of marriage with cruelty/harassment soon before by husband/relatives linked to dowry demand to raise rebuttable presump....
Conviction for dowry death requires consistent evidence of demand and harassment; contradictory evidence leads to benefit of doubt.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
