IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Prem Chand Shandil @ Santosh Jha – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.
1.Heard Mr. Jitendra S. Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Abhay Kumar Tiwary, learned Additional P.P.
2. The instant criminal appeal is directed against judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 31.03.2023 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Godda in Sessions Trial No. 187 of 2018, whereby and whereunder, the appellant has been held guilty and convicted for the offence under Section 304B of the I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life.
FACTUAL MATRIX
3. The factual matrix giving rise to this appeal, as depicted in the F.I.R. in a narrow compass, is that the informant’s daughter Snehlata Kumari @ Sweety (since deceased) was married with the present appellant on 30.11.2012 and out of their wedlock, a girl child namely, Bhabhya Bharti was begotten, who is at present 04 years old. It is alleged that for better education of the girl child Bhavya, Snehlata Kumari was residing at her parental house, but all of a sudden, her husband (appellant) took his wife and daughter at Lohia Nagar, Godda in the month of April, 2018 and left them in a rented house and got his daughter admitted in St. Thomas School, God
Bhupal Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Uttarakhand
The State of Uttarakhand Vs. Sanjay Ram Tamta @ Sanju @ Prem Prakash
Mustafa Shahadat Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra
Ramesh Vithal Patil v. State of Karnataka
Maya Devi & Anr. V. State of Haryana
In dowry death cases, prosecution must prove unnatural death within seven years of marriage with cruelty/harassment soon before by husband/relatives linked to dowry demand to raise rebuttable presump....
The court affirmed the conviction under Section 304-B IPC, establishing that the deceased was subjected to cruelty for dowry demands, leading to her suicide, thus satisfying the legal requirements fo....
Dowry death conviction under IPC Section 304B requires proof of cruelty/harassment for dowry demand soon before death to attract Evidence Act Section 113B presumption; mere presence at scene insuffic....
To convict under Section 304-B IPC, it must be proven that the victim faced cruelty for dowry-related demands occurring soon before death, which was not established in this case.
The prosecution must establish all ingredients of Section 304B IPC, including demand for dowry soon before death, to invoke presumption of guilt under Section 113B of the Evidence Act.
Point of Law : For offence Under Section 304-B Indian Penal Code, punishment is imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than seven years but which may extend to imprisonment for life.
Dowry death – Mere death of deceased being unnatural in matrimonial home within seven years of marriage will not be sufficient to convict accused under Section 304B and 498A of IPC.
The court upheld the conviction for dowry death under Section 304B IPC, establishing that harassment related to dowry demands occurred shortly before the victim's death, which was unnatural and withi....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.