Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RAJESH SHANKAR
Ramay Samad – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition filed for service dismissal quashing. (Para 1) |
| 2. allegations of misconduct and procedural violations. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. respondents maintained dismissal and due process. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. disciplinary evidence and procedural adequacy. (Para 6 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. limits of judicial review on punishment. (Para 12 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. simultaneous proceedings and evidence standards. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 7. writ petition dismissed with no merit. (Para 18) |
JUDGMENT :
RAJESH SHANKAR, J.
1. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order as contained in memo No. 257 dated 02.02.2020 (Annexure-4 to the writ petition) passed by the respondent No.4 by which the petitioner’s appeal preferred against the order of dismissal from service has been rejected. Further prayer has been made for quashing the order as contained in memo No. 4623 dated 30.09.2019 (Annexure-2 to the writ petition) passed by the respondent No.5 in Seraikella-Kharsawan District Departmental Proceeding No. 20 of 2019 whereby the petitioner has been dismissed from service w.e.f. 30.09.2019 with further direction to forfeit his salary for the period from 06.02.2018 to 23.11.2018 i.e. 291 days and from 24.11.20
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
