SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Jhk) 1098

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RAJESH SHANKAR
Ramay Samad – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Birat Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr. Divyam, A.C to S.C-IV

JUDGMENT :

RAJESH SHANKAR, J.

1. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order as contained in memo No. 257 dated 02.02.2020 (Annexure-4 to the writ petition) passed by the respondent No.4 by which the petitioner’s appeal preferred against the order of dismissal from service has been rejected. Further prayer has been made for quashing the order as contained in memo No. 4623 dated 30.09.2019 (Annexure-2 to the writ petition) passed by the respondent No.5 in Seraikella-Kharsawan District Departmental Proceeding No. 20 of 2019 whereby the petitioner has been dismissed from service w.e.f. 30.09.2019 with further direction to forfeit his salary for the period from 06.02.2018 to 23.11.2018 i.e. 291 days and from 24.11.2018 to 07.01.2019 i.e. 45 days (total 336 days) on the principle of ‘No Work, No Pay’ as the petitioner was unauthorisedly absent from duty during the said period which has been ordered to be accommodated in extraordinary leave. It has also been mentioned in the punishment order that the petitioner will be entitled to get only the subsistence allowance for the period of suspension i.e. from 08.01.2019 to 02.04.2019. The petitioner has also prayed for direct

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top