IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Tapan Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
1. Heard the parties.
2. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with the prayer to quash the entire criminal proceeding in connection with Ranga P.S. Case No. 109 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 522 of 2023 including the order taking cognizance dated 04.03.2024, passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajmahal in connection with the said Ranga P.S. Case No. 109 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 522 of 2023 whereby and where under the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajmahal has taken cognizance of the offences punishable under Section 379/411 of the Indian Penal Code, under Section 21(1) & 21(2) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and Rule 4/54 of the Jharkhand Minor Minerals Concession Rules, 2004 read with Rule 13 of Jharkhand Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage) Rules, 2017.
3. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners abandon the prayer to quash the entire criminal proceeding so far as the offence
Manish Khemka Vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors.
Calcutta Jaipur Paribahan Private Limited Vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors.
Cognizance of offences under the Mines and Minerals Act requires a complaint from authorized personnel; proceeding based on an FIR is not valid.
Cognizance of mining offences requires a written complaint from an authorized person; without it, proceedings are unsustainable.
The court clarified that cognizance under mining regulations requires an authorized complaint, while extortion allegations under IPC can proceed without such a complaint.
Cognizance for offences under mining statutes requires a written complaint by an authorized officer; IPC cognizance valid if essential theft elements are met.
Interpretation of vaioud relevant provisions of Code under Chapter XIV and of principles of law enunciated by this Court in a series of decisions relating to exercise of extraordinary power under Art....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.