SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Jhk) 92

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.
M/s Ranchi Expressways Limited – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through C.B.I. – Respondent
Cr. M.P. No. 4147 of 2022
Decided On : 21-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : R.S. Majumdar, Nishant Kumar
For the Respondents: Prashant Pallav, Parth Jalan

The court held that sufficient prima facie evidence of conspiracy and fund diversion justified the continuation of criminal proceedings without interference under Section 482 CrPC.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 120B, 409, 420, 477A; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Section 13(2) r/w 13(1)(a) - Petition to quash criminal proceedings for alleged misuse of funds in public project; Court held that prima facie evidence of conspiracy, fund diversion, and misappropriation of public money exists. (Paras 10-16)

(B) Quashing proceedings - High Court should not undertake an inquiry beyond prima facie evidence at this stage. If prima facie case established, Section 482 CrPC not applicable. (Paras 14-15)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners challenged the taking of cognizance by the lower court over allegations of fraud involving misappropriation of a significant public project budget without necessary progress in execution. The project involved a loan of approximately Rs. 1029.39 crores disbursed, with only 50% completion.

Findings of Court:
The Court found sufficient prima facie evidence against the petitioners, warranting continuation of criminal proceedings.

Issues: The main issues were whether there was sufficient evidence of conspiracy and fraud to warrant proceeding with criminal charges, and whether the High Court could quash proceedings under Section 482.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court reasoned that prima facie evidence established the case for continued proceedings; the appropriate standard under Section 482 did not support intervention here.

Result: CrMP dismissed.

Table of Content
1. facts leading to the filing of the fir (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments regarding prosecution and charges (Para 8 , 9)
3. court's review of investigation and material evidence (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. legal standards for quashing proceedings (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
5. conclusion of the judgment and dismissal of the petition (Para 17 , 18 , 19)

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.

1. Heard learned senior counsel Mr. R.S. Mazumdar appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel Mr. Prashant Pallav, appearing for the CBI.

2. This petition has been filed for quashing the entire criminal proceeding including the order dated 08.01.2021 passed in connection with R.C. Case No. 02 (A)/2019-R, whereby learned Special Judicial Magistrate, C.B.I., Ranchi, was pleased to find a prima facie case for proceeding under Sections 120B read with Section 409, 420, 477A of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioners and accordingly took cognizance of the same, pending in the Court of learned Additional Judicial Magistrate-XVI-cum-Special Judge, C.B.I., Ranchi.

3. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the prosecution case has been initiated on the basis of the FIR registered by the CBI being R.C. Case No. 02 (A)/2019-R dated 12.03.2019. He submits that it has been alleged in the F.I.R., inter-alia, that on P.Ε. 02 (A)/2018-R was registered in C.B.Ι., ACB, Ranchi 07.08.2018 in compliance of the order dated 25.07.2018 of the Hon'ble High Court of Jharkhand in W.P. (PIL) Nos. 3503 of 2014 and 2470 of 2015 in the matter of "The Court on its own motion Vs. Union of India".

4. He further submits that during the course of hearing in the above stated PILs, Hon'ble High Court of Jharkhand, vide order dated 14.11.2017, directed the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO), New Delhi, for inquiry into the matter, in which the Project of NH-33 from Ranchi to Jamshedpur was executed by the Agency and supervision by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) and advances that were given by the lending banks without commensurate physical progress in the execution of such a large public project involving Rs. 1655 Crores over a period of 5 years since its commencement in December, 2012. In compliance to order dated 14.11.2017 of Hon'ble High Court of Jharkhand, SFIO submitted its Enquiry Report, in sealed cover before the Hon'ble Court, which was opened on 14.06.2018.

5. He then submits that the above report pertains to the project of 4-laning of NH-33 from 114 Km to 277.50 Km. (Approx 163.50 Kms) on the Ranchi Rargaon Jamshedpur section. NHAI had invited bids for the above project on annuity basis on Design, Built, Finance, Operate and Transfer (DBFOT) pattern during March, 2010. After completing the process, Letter of Award was given to M/s. Madhucon Project Ltd. on 18.03.2011, it being lowest bidder. As per requirement, a Special Purpose i.e., M/s. Ranchi Expressways Ltd. (Concessionaire) was incorporated by Madhucon Group, to execute this project. Shri K. Sinivasa Rao, Shri N. Seethaiah and Shri N. Prithvi Teja were the founding Directors of the said company. For this purpose, the concessionaire M/s. Ranchi Expressways Ltd. entered into a Concession Agreement with NHAI on 20.04.2011, whereupon the project was entrusted to the Concessionaire for execution.

(i) He further submits that it has been alleged that the estimated cost of the four-laning project was Rs. 1655 Crores, as per the Common Loan Agreement (CLA) dated 31.10.2011, between Ranchi Expressways Ltd. and Consortium of Banks. Initially a sum of Rs.1191.60 Crores was to be founded by a consortium of 15 banks led by Canara Bank, however, the same came down to Rs. 1151.60 Cores, as State Bank of Travancore backed out. Consequently, the contribution by the promoters was increased from Rs. 463.40 to Rs. 503.40 Crores. The SFIO, concluded in its Report that a total of Rs. 264.01 crore was not made available for the purpose of the project/diverted, which is as de

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top