Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, RAJESH KUMAR
Jai Prakash Oraon – Appellant
Versus
Sushma Toppo, wife of Jai Prakash Oraon – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual overview of marriage and disputes. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. evidence and proceedings in family court. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. dismissal of the petitioner’s suit. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. petitioner’s arguments against judgment. (Para 12 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. respondent’s defense of the judgment. (Para 13) |
| 6. court's assessment and observations. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 7. definition and application of restitution of conjugal rights laws. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 26 , 30 , 31 , 33) |
| 8. reasoning behind court's decision on appeal. (Para 32 , 34 , 37) |
| 9. final judgment and order of dismissal. (Para 39 , 40 , 41) |
JUDGMENT :
Prayer
1. The instant appeal under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984is directed against the order/judgment dated 05.11.2024 and decree dated 16.11.2024 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Ranchi in Original Suit No. 18 of 2022, whereby and whereunder, the Suit filed by the appellant under Section 22 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954, has been dismissed.
Factual Matrix
2. The brief facts of the case, leading to filing of the petition filed under Section 22 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954, by the petitioner/appellant,needs to be referred he
The right to restitution of conjugal rights under the Special Marriage Act is contingent upon proving a spouse's withdrawal from marital society without reasonable cause, weighing the evidence of ill....
Restitution of conjugal rights – Remedy of restitution of conjugal rights is a positive remedy that requires both parties to live together and cohabit – Rights and duties arising out of marriage are ....
The burden of proof in restitution of conjugal rights lies with the withdrawing spouse to show reasonable cause for separation; the court affirms joint responsibility in marriage.
Restitution decree under Section 9 HMA denied as wife failed to prove husband's withdrawal without reasonable excuse; acquittal in cruelty case and unreliable evidence establish justification.
Restitution of conjugal rights can be granted if one spouse withdraws from the other's society without reasonable excuse; allegations of desertion must be substantiated with evidence.
In Muslim law restitution suits, courts refuse decree if husband's proven cruelty or conduct creates life apprehension, making cohabitation inequitable; family court reversal warranted for perverse e....
In a suit for restitution of conjugal rights, the burden of proof is on the petitioner to establish that the other spouse has withdrawn from the conjugal society without any reasonable cause. The res....
The conduct of a spouse can provide sufficient grounds for the other spouse to withdraw from the society, as per Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
