Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Anil Prasad Jaiswal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
Heard the parties.
2. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with the prayer to quash the entire criminal proceeding including the order dated 07.03.2024 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Jorapokhar P.S. Case No. 49 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 690 of 2024 whereby and where under the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Dhanbad has taken cognizance of the offences punishable under Section 406, 420 of the Indian Penal Code and passed summoning order against the petitioner as well.
3. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner requested the informant to invest Rs.6,00,000/- to open a Marriage Hall in a land belonging to his wife. The informant agreed for the same and an agreement was made between the parties. It is alleged that the intention of the petitioner was bad and he is not paying back the money to the informant. On the basis of the written report submitted by the informant, police registered Jorapokhar P.S. Case No. 49 of 2022 and took up investigation of the case an
Criminal proceedings cannot be sustained based on suppressed material facts in a dispute that is fundamentally civil in nature.
High Court under Section 482 CrPC cannot quash proceedings where specific allegations of cruelty, dowry demands, assaults and harassment prima facie constitute offences; no evidence appreciation at t....
The court ruled that allegations in the FIR did not constitute a criminal offence, characterizing the matter as a civil dispute, allowing quashing under Section 482 of the CrPC.
Civil disputes can involve criminal elements; thus, the existence of a civil remedy does not automatically justify quashing a criminal FIR.
The court held that the evidence provided by the informant, including witness statements and marriage documentation, substantiates the allegations of cruelty and fraud against the petitioner.
A mere breach of contract does not amount to cheating unless there is an intention to deceive from the inception of the agreement; allegations of insult and intimidation must meet specific legal thre....
A dispute over loan repayment, lacking evidence of deception or fraudulent intent, is deemed a civil matter and does not justify criminal proceedings under the Indian Penal Code.
The main legal point established is that the power to quash a criminal proceeding should be exercised sparingly and with circumspection, especially in cases where the allegations do not prima-facie c....
A breach of contract does not automatically constitute the offence of cheating under the IPC; intention to defraud must be established from the inception of the agreement.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
