IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Renu Jha – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
Heard the parties.
2. Since, both these cases have been filed with the same prayer arising out the same case, hence, both these Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions are being disposed of by this common judgment.
3. These Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions have been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with the prayer to quash and set aside the entire criminal proceeding arising out of Mahila P.S. Case No.42 of 2023 including the order dated 29.10.2024 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Ranchi whereby and where under the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Ranchi has taken cognizance for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 323, 506, 504, 354A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 /4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act against the petitioners.
4. The allegation against the petitioners are that the petitioner of Cr.M.P. No.773 of 2024 is the husband and the Petitioners of Cr.M.P. No.708 of 2024 are the mother-in-law and father-in-law of the informant and the allegation against the petitioners are that the petitioners being the husband and relatives of the husband of the informant
Geddam Jhansi & Another vs. The State of Telangana & Others
Preeti Gupta & Another vs. State of Jharkhand & Another
R.P. Kapur vs. State of Punjab
Sharif Ahmed & Another vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Another
Satvinder Kaur vs. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
State of Orissa vs. Saroj Kumar Sahoo
Neeharika Infrastructure (P) Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra
State of Gujarat vs. Girish Radhakrishnan Varde
Iqbal alias Bala and Others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others
High Court under Section 482 CrPC cannot quash proceedings where specific allegations of cruelty, dowry demands, assaults and harassment prima facie constitute offences; no evidence appreciation at t....
When the charge sheet is submitted, the trial court should consider the merits of the case instead of quashing the entire criminal proceeding. Specific allegations against the accused should be consi....
The High Court cannot quash an FIR unless the allegations do not constitute an offence; the judiciary must respect the trial process and not supplant it with its judgment on the merits of the case.
There is no prohibition against quashing of criminal proceedings even after charge-sheet has been filed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.