Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Shrvan Kumar Yadav @ Shrvan Yadav, son of Asho Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.
I.A. No.17424 of 2025
1. Heard the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this interlocutory application has been filed with the prayer to amend the instant Criminal Miscellaneous Petition by incorporating the word ‘quash’ between the words ‘please to’ and ‘entire criminal proceeding’ in the prayer portion of the instant Criminal Miscellaneous Petition. It is then submitted that the proposed amendment is formal in nature which has been made to cure the inadvertent mistakes in the criminal miscellaneous petition. It is next submitted that unless the said prayer is allowed, the petitioners will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the prayer as prayed for in this interlocutory application be allowed.
3. Considering the aforesaid facts, the prayer to carry out the amendment as prayed for in this interlocutory application is allowed.
4. The petitioners are directed to file consolidated Criminal Miscellaneous Petition by incorporating the word ‘quash’ between the words ‘please to’ and ‘entire criminal proceeding’ in the prayer portion of the instant Criminal Miscellaneous Petition.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners fil
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings based on settlement between parties if continuation poses an injustice, especially in non-heinous, private disputes.
The court can quash criminal proceedings when a private dispute is resolved through compromise, indicating a remote chance of conviction and preventing abuse of the legal process.
High Court quashed proceedings under inherent powers upon parties' settlement in petty neighbourhood dispute over cattle grazing, as conviction remote, continuation abuses process, following guidelin....
The court emphasized the power to quash criminal proceedings where a complete settlement exists between parties in non-heinous offences, ensuring no public policy is violated.
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure if the parties have settled their disputes, provided the offences are not heinous and the continuatio....
High Court quashed proceedings under inherent powers for non-heinous private land dispute offences including attempt to murder, post-compromise at investigation stage, as injuries simple, conviction ....
Compromise between parties in non-heinous criminal cases allows for quashing proceedings if continuation would cause oppression, outlining the scope of Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
High Court quashed proceedings for non-heinous offences on parties' compromise in private dispute, as continuation abuses process, conviction remote, securing ends of justice per Supreme Court guidel....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
