Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Naresh Kumar Yadav @ Naresh Yadav, S/o. Late Bulaki Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
Heard the parties.
2. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with the prayer to quash the entire criminal proceedings of Hirodih P.S. Case No.55 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and the said case is now pending in the court of learned J.M-1st Class, Giridih.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the investigation of the case is still going on and charge-sheet has not yet been submitted in this case.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the informant/opposite party No.2 jointly draw the attention of this Court towards Interlocutory Application No.2622 of 2026 which is supported by the separate affidavits of Pairvikar of the petitioner as well as the informant/opposite party No.2 of this case and submit that therein it has categorically been mentioned that with the intervention of well- wishers of both sides, the parties have settled their dispute including the core dispute related with land and in view of
High Court quashed proceedings under inherent powers for non-heinous private land dispute offences including attempt to murder, post-compromise at investigation stage, as injuries simple, conviction ....
Compromise between parties in non-heinous criminal cases allows for quashing proceedings if continuation would cause oppression, outlining the scope of Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
The court quashed the FIR based on a compromise between parties, emphasizing that continuation of proceedings would cause injustice and that the possibility of conviction was remote.
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings based on settlement between parties if continuation poses an injustice, especially in non-heinous, private disputes.
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure if the parties have settled their disputes, provided the offences are not heinous and the continuatio....
High Court quashed proceedings for non-heinous offences on parties' compromise in private dispute, as continuation abuses process, conviction remote, securing ends of justice per Supreme Court guidel....
The court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 of the CrPC when parties settle their dispute, especially in cases with a civil nature, preventing abuse of process.
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 of the Code when a compromise between parties suggests that continuation would be unjust or oppressive, provided the offenses are not h....
The court can quash criminal proceedings when a private dispute is resolved through compromise, indicating a remote chance of conviction and preventing abuse of the legal process.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
