IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Babulal Marandi S/o Late Chhotu Marandi – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
1. Heard the parties.
2. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with the prayer to quash and set aside the entire criminal proceeding in connection with Kanke P.S. Case No.210 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 500, 504 & 505(2) of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner.
3. The brief fact of the case is that the informant has submitted a written report to the Officer-in-charge of Kanke Police Station alleging therein that the petitioner being the leader of the BJP and the State President of BJP has made a statement that “The entire Family of my Leader are looters”. It is alleged that the said statement was made against the leaders of the informant namely Sibu Soren and Hemant Soren.
4. On the basis of the written report submitted by the informant police registered Kanke P.S. Case No.210 of 2023 and took up investigation of the case.
5. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the investigation of the case is still going on and charge sheet has not yet been submitted.
6. Learned Senior counsel for the pet
S. Khushboo vs. Kanniammal & Another
Subramanian Swamy vs. Union of India, Ministry of Law & Others
Arnab Ranjan Goswami vs. Union of India & Others
Patricia Mukhim vs. State of Meghalaya & Others
An FIR for defamation under IPC Section 500 is not maintainable unless filed by the aggrieved party, as clarified by pertinent Supreme Court rulings.
FIR impermissible for defamation without aggrieved person's complaint; political statement calling family 'born looters' lacks mens rea for promoting enmity, provocation for breach of peace, or incit....
The court emphasized the importance of freedom of the press and the need to exercise inherent powers to prevent abuse of process of law.
The court established that for offences under Section 188 IPC, a written complaint from the concerned public servant is mandatory, and without it, the FIRs cannot be maintained. Furthermore, the cour....
Defamation, intentional insult, criminal intimidation and insulting gestures – Merely pendency of a civil suit is cannot render a criminal proceeding otiose but it is to be seen whether complaint its....
The essential ingredients of an offense under Section 504 of the Indian Penal Code must be met for the charge to be sustained.
No offence under IPC Sections 188 and 295(A) was established against the petitioner, leading to the quashing of the FIR due to political rivalry.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.