Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Prem Ram @ Prem Ravidas – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments by the appellant and state (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis of evidence (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 11) |
| 4. defense's stance and witness examination (Para 10) |
| 5. final judgment and directive (Para 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT :
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.
1. We have already heard Mr. Dhirendra Kumar Prasad, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Fahad Allam, learned A.P.P. appearing for the State.
2. Instant criminal appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction dated 04.04.2019 and order of sentence dated 12.04.2019 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge - XIV, Hazaribagh in S.T. No.573 of 2013, whereby and whereunder the appellant has been held guilty for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life along with fine of Rs.10,000/- with default stipulation.
FACTUAL MATRIX
3. Factual matrix giving rise to this appeal is that the informant's daughter Suma Devi, aged about 30 years (since deceased), was married with Prem Ram (appellant) about 12 years ago according to Hindu rites and rituals. After marriage, Soma Devi started residing at her matrimonial ho
The court upheld the conviction for murder based on eyewitness testimony and established motive, dismissing intoxication as a defense.
The court upheld the conviction for murder based on circumstantial evidence, establishing the accused's guilt through a combination of testimonies, confessional statements, and lack of viable alterna....
The conviction under Section 302 IPC was upheld as the prosecution established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt through circumstantial evidence and witness testimonies, including the appellant's own a....
The conviction under Section 302 IPC was upheld due to compelling circumstantial evidence linking the appellant to the murder, ruling that suspicion alone is insufficient without definitive proof of ....
A conviction under the IPC cannot be upheld without concrete evidence linking the appellant to the crime, and a judgment must not rely on mere suspicion.
Murder conviction on circumstantial evidence requires complete unbroken chain excluding innocence; absent proof of foundational facts like last seen together and court direction, appellants entitled ....
A conviction for murder requires reliable and corroborated evidence, particularly when based on the testimony of a sole eyewitness; contradictions and lack of corroboration can lead to the reversal o....
The prosecution must prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, relying primarily on credible eyewitness testimony and corroborative forensic evidence, particularly in murder convictions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
