Nimai Pandit S/o Bhushan Pandit vs State of Jharkhand

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Jhk) 274

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Nimai Pandit S/o Bhushan Pandit – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Rajiv Lochan, Sanjay Kumar, Nanda Kumari
For the Respondent: Tarun Kumar
For the Informant : Kamdeo Pandey

JUDGMENT :

ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY, J.

1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties including the learned counsel for the informant, namely, Nimai Pandit S/o Pandu Pandit, who is also the sole victim in the present case.

2. This appeal has been filed for setting aside the judgment of conviction dated 02.08.2005 and sentence dated 03.08.2005 passed in Sessions Case No.206/1999 corresponding to Sessions Case No.12/2001 by the learned 1^st Additional Sessions Judge, Jamtara, whereby the appellant nos. 1 to 4 has been held guilty of offence under Sections 147 and 323 of IPC ; appellant no. 5 has been held guilt of offence under Sections 148 and 307 of and appellant no. 6 has been held guilty of offence under , 307 and 379 of .

3. The learned trial court has been pleased to sentence the appellant, namely, Anil Pandit (appellant no. 5 herein) and Akur Pandit (appellant no. 6 herein) for a period of 3 years for offence under Section 148 of IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of 7 years for offence under Section 307 of and Akur Pandit has been further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 3 years for offence under Section 379 of . The appellants, name