IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Aditya Khemka – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
Heard the parties.
2. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with the prayer to quash the entire criminal proceedings including the order taking cognizance dated 07.12.2022 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi in connection with Complaint Case No. 6708 of 2021 whereby and where under the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi found sufficient material to proceed against the petitioner for having committed the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The brief fact of the case is that the petitioner approached the complainant to sell Infrared Thermometer Gun at the rate of Rs.3,250/- each plus tax if the order would be for 1000 pieces of thermometers. The complainant altogether in installments sent Rs.36,10,000/-to the petitioners and the thermometers were to be supplied before 29.04.2020 but the petitioners did not supply any Infrared Thermometer within the stipulated time of 29.04.2020 and supplied 200 pieces on 11.05.2020 but the same were worse than the products that were to be supplied and subseque
Uma Shankar Gopalika vs. State of Bihar & Another
Vesa Holdings Private Limited & Another Vs. State of Kerala & Others
Vijay Kumar Ghai & Others vs. State of West Bengal & Others
Sarabjit Kaur vs. State of Punjab & Another
For an offence under Section 420 IPC, essential deception must exist from the transaction's inception; mere breach of contract is insufficient to constitute cheating.
Breach of contract does not constitute cheating unless deception and dishonest intention at inception. Advance payment for property sale is not entrustment; mere non-execution of sale deed without mi....
A mere breach of contract does not constitute a criminal offense unless there is evidence of fraudulent intent from the inception of the agreement.
A mere inability to repay a loan does not amount to cheating unless there was deception from the inception of the transaction.
For an offense of cheating under Section 420 IPC, there must be deception at inception; mere breach of contract is insufficient to establish criminal liability.
To constitute offences under Sections 420, 323, and 504 IPC, essential ingredients of intent, injury, or insult must be established at the onset; mere breach of contract or abusive language without t....
A breach of contract does not constitute cheating unless there is initial deception; mere non-payment does not amount to criminal breach of trust.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.