IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Sujit Narayan Prasad, Arun Kumar Rai, JJ.
Suresh Prasad Rajak - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India through Divisional Railway Manager, East Central Railway - Respondents
W.P.(S) No. 1619 of 2025
Decided On : 06-02-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's unauthorized retention of railway quarter post-transfer. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's challenge to damage rent quantum and gratuity recovery. (Para 4 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. tribunal upholds recovery under railway pension rules. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. respondents justify recovery per rule 15(2) and om. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. judicial review limited to apparent errors or perversity. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. rule 15(2) allows damage rent recovery from gratuity. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 7. quantification valid based unchallenged policy and calculations. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 8. railway rules govern gratuity, not payment of gratuity act. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 9. poor quarter condition no defense post-occupation. (Para 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 10. no interference; writ petition dismissed. (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
JUDGMENT :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.
1. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 15.10.2024 passed in O.A. No.051/00698/2022 by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Circuit Bench, Ranchi whereby and whereunder, the learned Tribunal has dismissed the said original application by passing the following order:
“21. From the above factual analysis in the light of relevant rule, enunciated in the Railway Services (Pension) Rules 1993, Railway Master Circular No. 49 and 0M dt. 20th October, 2023 issued by the D/o Pension & Pensioners' welfare, we do not find any infirmity in the letter no. TT/48/MISC/22, dt. 24.02.2022 of the competent authority for deduction of damage rent against unauthorized retention of occupied railway quarter no. 53 CD for the period from 15.12.2017 to 03.12.20211. and in the order dt. 25.03.2022 issued by the Sr. Divisional Engineer (Estate), ECR Dhanbad for deduction of damage rent Rs.11,19,544/- in favour of applicant and communicated to Sr. Divisional Personnel Officer, Dhanbad for deduction of the same, (Annexure-A/2) and Rs. 11,19,544/- has been deducted/ recovered vide his order dt. 25.03.2022 from his retirement gratuity.”
2. The brief facts of the case as per the pleading made in the writ petition having been enumerated as per the pleading which is available in the original application needs to be referred here which is as under:
The applicant, petitioner herein, joined on 07.02.1986 under the E.C. Railway, Dhanbad to the post of Assistant Station Manager and superannuated on 31.01.2022 from the post of Station Manager, Hirodih Railway Sation.
Case of the applicant is that after retirement all retiral dues were paid to him but an amount of Rs.11,19,544/- has been deducted/recovered on account of unauthorized retention of railway quarter for the period 15.12.2017 to 03.12.2021 from the amount of retirement gratuity vide order dated 24.02.2022 issued by respondent no.3 and letter dated 25.03.2022 issued by respondent no.6 wherein details of recovery amount has been shown.
The case of the applicant as per the original application is that while he was posted at Sindri BH, a railway quarter at Station Road, Rangatand, Railway Quarters Colony, Dhanbad vide letter dated 15.06.2014 was allotted to him. It is stated that the applicant was transferred from Sindri BH to HRE (Hirodih) on 18.10.2017 and relieved on 15.12.2017.
The petitioner/applicant retained abandoned railway quarter at Rangatand, Dhanbad till 03.12.2021 and during that period normal quarter rent, electricity charges, water charges have been deducted from the salary of the applicant.
After retirement without any show cause notice, the amount of Rs.11,19,544/- has been recovered/deducted from gratuity amount of the applicant against damage panel rent.
It is also stated that the Station Manager, Hirodih has issued a certificate dated 22.08.2022 stating that the applicant was not provided any railway accommodation at Hirodih Station during his posting. Applicant has submitted representations dated 31.01.2022 & 31.03.20



L. Chandra Kumar vs. Union of India and Ors.
West Bengal Central School Service Commission vs. Abdul Halim
Recovery of damage rent for unauthorized railway quarter retention permissible from retirement gratuity under Rule 15(2) of Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993 as government dues; Payment of Gratu....
Law prohibits benefits from unauthorized actions; withholding gratuity for valid government dues is lawful.
Damage rent for unauthorized retention post-retirement calculated under service rules (DGMS R.18, FR 45-A), separate from eviction under PPE Act.
Retention of railway quarters post-transfer limited to academic session end (last exam +15 days); excess occupation deemed unauthorized attracting telescopic damage rent, but period recalculated per ....
Eviction can be lawfully executed under public premises legislation when occupancy after a specified period lapses, regardless of retention requests from a former government employee, allowing for re....
An employer is entitled to withhold gratuity and adjust penal rent for unauthorized occupation of employer-allotted accommodation. Gratuity and vacation of premises are reciprocal obligations, and in....
A former employee's unauthorized retention of government quarters beyond the permissible period constitutes unlawful occupation, justifying eviction and recovery of related charges from pension benef....
The court determined that gratuity can be withheld if an ex-employee fails to vacate company accommodation, constituting a breach of internal policies.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.