SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Jhk) 356

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Sujit Narayan Prasad, Arun Kumar Rai, JJ.
Suresh Prasad Rajak - Petitioner
Versus
Union of India through Divisional Railway Manager, East Central Railway - Respondents
W.P.(S) No. 1619 of 2025
Decided On : 06-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Vijayant Verma, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Abhijeet Kr. Singh, C.G.C.

Recovery of damage rent for unauthorized railway quarter retention permissible from retirement gratuity under Rule 15(2) of Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993 as government dues; Payment of Gratuity Act inapplicable.

Headnote:(A) Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993 - Rule 15(2) - Government dues including damage rent for unauthorized occupation of railway quarter beyond permissible period adjustable and recoverable from retirement gratuity - Gratuity part of pensionary benefits under Rules, 1993; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 inapplicable - Quantification of damage rent based on office memoranda and circulars justified where basis unchallenged. Condition of quarter irrelevant post-acceptance and retention. (Paras 24, 25, 37, 38, 40)

(B) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Judicial review of tribunal order limited to error apparent on face of record or perversity - Not for re-appreciation of evidence, substitution of views or where reasoning process establishes decision - Patent error self-evident without argument. (Paras 16-21)

Facts of the case:
Retired railway servant allotted railway quarter retained it unauthorizedly from date of relief on transfer till post-retirement vacation. Normal licence fee deducted during occupation; post-retirement damage rent quantified at Rs.11,19,544/- recovered from retirement gratuity without prior show-cause. Representations and appeal rejected; original application before tribunal dismissed; writ petition filed challenging quantification as exorbitant, recoverability from gratuity and quarter's poor condition.

Findings of Court:
Quantification per applicable policy documents; recovery permissible under Rule 15(2); no error apparent or perversity in tribunal order.

Issues: Justification of damage rent quantification; recoverability from retirement gratuity; relevance of quarter's condition; scope of judicial review.

Ratio Decidendi: Rule 15(2) mandates adjustment of outstanding government dues like damage rent against gratuity; unchallenged policy basis validates quantification; acceptance of allotment precludes later challenge to habitability; review confined to manifest errors. Result : Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's unauthorized retention of railway quarter post-transfer. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. petitioner's challenge to damage rent quantum and gratuity recovery. (Para 4 , 10 , 11)
3. tribunal upholds recovery under railway pension rules. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. respondents justify recovery per rule 15(2) and om. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
5. judicial review limited to apparent errors or perversity. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
6. rule 15(2) allows damage rent recovery from gratuity. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
7. quantification valid based unchallenged policy and calculations. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35)
8. railway rules govern gratuity, not payment of gratuity act. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39)
9. poor quarter condition no defense post-occupation. (Para 40 , 41 , 42)
10. no interference; writ petition dismissed. (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46)

JUDGMENT :

Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.

1. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 15.10.2024 passed in O.A. No.051/00698/2022 by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Circuit Bench, Ranchi whereby and whereunder, the learned Tribunal has dismissed the said original application by passing the following order:

21. From the above factual analysis in the light of relevant rule, enunciated in the Railway Services (Pension) Rules 1993, Railway Master Circular No. 49 and 0M dt. 20th October, 2023 issued by the D/o Pension & Pensioners' welfare, we do not find any infirmity in the letter no. TT/48/MISC/22, dt. 24.02.2022 of the competent authority for deduction of damage rent against unauthorized retention of occupied railway quarter no. 53 CD for the period from 15.12.2017 to 03.12.20211. and in the order dt. 25.03.2022 issued by the Sr. Divisional Engineer (Estate), ECR Dhanbad for deduction of damage rent Rs.11,19,544/- in favour of applicant and communicated to Sr. Divisional Personnel Officer, Dhanbad for deduction of the same, (Annexure-A/2) and Rs. 11,19,544/- has been deducted/ recovered vide his order dt. 25.03.2022 from his retirement gratuity.”

2. The brief facts of the case as per the pleading made in the writ petition having been enumerated as per the pleading which is available in the original application needs to be referred here which is as under:

The applicant, petitioner herein, joined on 07.02.1986 under the E.C. Railway, Dhanbad to the post of Assistant Station Manager and superannuated on 31.01.2022 from the post of Station Manager, Hirodih Railway Sation.

Case of the applicant is that after retirement all retiral dues were paid to him but an amount of Rs.11,19,544/- has been deducted/recovered on account of unauthorized retention of railway quarter for the period 15.12.2017 to 03.12.2021 from the amount of retirement gratuity vide order dated 24.02.2022 issued by respondent no.3 and letter dated 25.03.2022 issued by respondent no.6 wherein details of recovery amount has been shown.

The case of the applicant as per the original application is that while he was posted at Sindri BH, a railway quarter at Station Road, Rangatand, Railway Quarters Colony, Dhanbad vide letter dated 15.06.2014 was allotted to him. It is stated that the applicant was transferred from Sindri BH to HRE (Hirodih) on 18.10.2017 and relieved on 15.12.2017.

The petitioner/applicant retained abandoned railway quarter at Rangatand, Dhanbad till 03.12.2021 and during that period normal quarter rent, electricity charges, water charges have been deducted from the salary of the applicant.

After retirement without any show cause notice, the amount of Rs.11,19,544/- has been recovered/deducted from gratuity amount of the applicant against damage panel rent.

It is also stated that the Station Manager, Hirodih has issued a certificate dated 22.08.2022 stating that the applicant was not provided any railway accommodation at Hirodih Station during his posting. Applicant has submitted representations dated 31.01.2022 & 31.03.20



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top