Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Uttam Kumar Mahato @ Uttam Kumar son of Bhuwaneshwar @ Bhuneshwar Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
1. Heard the parties.
2. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with the prayer to quash the order dated 09.06.2022 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Bokaro in connection with C.P. Case No.646 of 2021 whereby and where under the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Bokaro has found prima facie case for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 506, 504, 323, 341, 417, 427 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the case is at the stage of appearance and charge has not yet been framed by the trial court.
4. The brief fact of the case is that ten years prior to recording of the statement on solemn affirmation of the complainant on 04.10.2021, in the year 2010, the petitioners paid Rs.3,00,000/-. The petitioners have further got the work started on the land. When the complainant asked for paying the remaining money, the petitioners told him to go anywhere he wishes and nothing will happen. It is alleged that on 05.07.2021, the accused persons came to the hou
To substantiate IPC offences, essential elements must be satisfied; mere allegations are insufficient to continue criminal proceedings.
No cheating absent deception from transaction's inception; mere salary shortfall not offence. Sections 504/506 require provocation for breach of peace or threat of injury with alarm-causing intent – ....
Quashing under CrPC Section 482 as no prima facie case for IPC Sections 406, 420, 427, 506/34 even if all allegations true, lacking initial deception, entrustment, property mischief, and intimidation....
Charges cannot proceed without substantiation of essential elements; mere allegations are insufficient to maintain criminal prosecution.
Not every breach of contract amounts to cheating, and mere retention of property does not constitute dishonest misappropriation. The essential ingredients for criminal offences under the Indian Penal....
Mere allegation of 'marpit' without evidence of hurt fails Section 323 IPC ingredients; abuse sans provocation for public peace breach insufficient for Section 504 IPC. Quashing under Section 482 CrP....
To establish an offense under Sections 406 and 420 IPC, it is essential to demonstrate entrustment and deception from the transaction's inception, respectively; lack of these elements leads to the qu....
A mere breach of contract does not amount to cheating unless there is an intention to deceive from the inception of the agreement; allegations of insult and intimidation must meet specific legal thre....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
