SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Jhk) 2298

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANANDA SEN, J.
Vinita Sinha, W/o Late Manoj Kumar Sinha - Petitioners
Versus
Coal India Limited - Respondents
W.P.(S) No.5285 of 2021
Decided On : 15-10-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Ms. Oishi Das, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Anoop Kumar Mehta, Advocate
Mr. Pratyush, Advocate

The denial of mandatory monetary compensation to an eligible widow on the ground that a daughter was separately pursuing a claim for compassionate appointment is impermissible. The employer remains obligated to provide such contractual benefits following an employee's death, notwithstanding the pendency of alternative, unsuccessful legal claims.

Headnote:(A) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 18 - Compassionate appointment - Interpretation of wage agreement provisions - Right to monetary compensation for female dependents.

(B) Entitlement of dependents - Employer's duty to process social security benefits - Impact of pursuing alternative remedies on entitlement to monetary compensation.

Facts of the case:
An employee passed away in harness. The surviving family members, consisting of the widow and a married daughter, sought compassionate appointment for the daughter. The employer rejected the daughter's claim based on the terms of the wage agreement. The widow, being above the age threshold to qualify for compassionate appointment, was eligible for monetary compensation, which had not been processed or paid, with the employer citing a lack of a formal application for such compensation by the widow.

Findings of Court:
The court determined that the widow's failure to apply for monetary compensation while the daughter's claim for compassionate appointment was being pursued in good faith did not extinguish her entitlement to such benefits. The employer maintains an inherent duty to provide monetary compensation to the eligible spouse following the death of an employee, notwithstanding the pendency of other unsuccessful claims.

Issues: Whether the pursuit of an unsuccessful claim for compassionate appointment by one family member precludes the eligible dependent widow from receiving monetary compensation, and whether the employer is relieved of the obligation to pay such benefits in the absence of an independent application.

Ratio Decidendi: A surviving dependent is not barred from receiving mandatory monetary compensation simply because an alternative, unsuccessful claim for compassionate appointment was pursued by another relative. Statutory or contractual obligations regarding social security benefits must be upheld by the employer, and procedural delays originating from the pursuit of bona fide legal remedies should not result in the denial of accrued benefits.

Result: Petition disposed of; respondents directed to process and pay monetary compensation to the widow within the specified timeframe.

Table of Content
1. request for compassionate appointment of married daughter. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. applicability of monetary compensation rules per ncwa. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
3. entitlement of widow to monetary compensation despite non-application. (Para 14 , 15)

JUDGMENT :

Heard learned counsel representing the petitioners and learned counsel representing the respondents.

2. The petitioners are not pursuing the first prayer, which is the challenge thrown to clause-9.4.2 of the National Coal Wage Agreement (NCWA).

2.1. The second prayer of the petitioners is to quash Letter e0iz0 ch0 dk0fo0 No. / -2/ /2021/685 dated 27/28.07.2021, whereby the application of petitioner No.1 – Vinita Sinha (widow of the deceased employee – Manoj Kumar Sinha) for grant of compassionate appointment to her married daughter – Surbhi Sinha (petitioner No.2 / daughter of the deceased employee - Manoj Kumar Sinha), was rejected.

2.2. Further prayer has been made to grant compassionate appointment to the petitioner No.2.

3. Admittedly, the petitioner No.1 is the widow of Manoj Kumar Sinha (deceased) and petitioner No.2 is the daughter of Manoj Kumar Sinha (deceased).

4. In this case, compassionate appointment was claimed for the married daughter (petitioner No.2).

5. Late Manoj Kumar Sinha, joined the Bharat Coking Coal Limited (BCCL), on 28.08.1985. He died in harness on 01.10.2020, while working on the post of Accountant.

6. It is the case of the petitioners that Manoj Kumar Sinha, died leaving behind these two petitioners as his legal heirs being petitioner No.1 (wife) and petitioner No.2 (daughter, who is now married). The daughter claims compassionate appointment as her mother stated that she is completely dependent upon her daughter. 7. Admittedly, the National Coal Wage Agreement (NCWA) is an Agreement between the Union and the Management. The same is in terms of Section 18 of the Industrial Disputes Act. The National Coal Wage Agreement at that relevant point of time did not provide grant of compassionate appointment to the married daughters, as the married daughters were not treated to be the dependent of the deceased-employee, who dies in harness.

8. On the aforesaid ground, the application for compassionate appointment of the petitioner No.2 was rejected.

9. The respondents vide their Letter No.e0iz0/ch0-2/dk0fo0/2022/64(A) dated 25.01.2022 2/ /2022/64(A) dated 25.01.2022 had directed petitioner No.1 to claim monetary compensation, which she is entitled to receive on account of death of her husband – late Manoj Kumar Sinha. They also instructed petitioner No.1 to file an appropriate application claiming monetary compensation.

10. There is a provision in the National Coal Wage Agreement to grant monetary compensation. Chapter-IX of the NCWA deals with Social Securities. Clause-9.5.0 provides for an Employment / Monetary compensation to female dependant. Clause-9.5.0 (ii) provides that where an employee dies in harness, other than mine accident, if the female dependent is below the age of 45 years, she has an option either to accept the monetary compensation of Rs.3,000/- per month or employment. In case, if the female dependant is aged above 45 years, she is only entitled for the monetary compensation and not for the employment. It is necessary to quote clause-9.5.0 (ii), which reads as hereunder:-

9.5.0 Employment/Monetary compensation to female dependant (i) …………

ii) In case of death/total permanent disablement due to cause other than mine accident and medical unfitness under Clause 9.4.0, if the female dependant is below the age of 45 years she will have the option either to accept the monetary compensation of Rs. 3,000/- per month or employment.

In case the female dependant is above 45 years of age she will be entitled only to monetary compensation and not to employment”

10.1. Further, clause-9.5.0 (iv) provides that the monetary compensation would be paid till the female dependant attains the age of 60 years.

11. In this case, husban

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top