Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Anirudh Pathak, Son of Late Ramprit Pathak – Appellant
Versus
Quraisha Bibi, Wife of Late Akhtar Khan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. I have already heard the arguments advanced by Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Tiwari, learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mr. T.N. Jha, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
2. This instant second appeal has been preferred by the appellant being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and decree dated 17.02.2011 (signed on 07.03.2011) passed by learned Additional District Judge, F.T.C.-I, Garhwa in Title Appeal No.20 of 2008 affirming and upholding the judgment and decree dated 22.09.2008 (signed on 03.10.2008) passed by learned Munsiff, Garhwa in Title Suit No.51 of 2003, whereby and whereunder the suit of the plaintiff has been dismissed.
3. Appellant has raised following substantial questions of law for adjudication in this second appeal :-
(i) Whether since the plaintiff was claiming raiyati rights on the basis of reclamation and conversion into Korkar, the learned Courts below have gravely erred in deciding issue No.VII against the plaintiff by relying upon the Amendment Act 25 of 1947, although the plaintiff had pleaded case of reclamation during 1945-46?
(ii) Whether the learned Courts below erred in not placing reliance on the possessory title, ought to h
Possession established through reclamation under the C.N.T. Act is valid if supported by evidence of landlord consent, and findings from criminal proceedings do not bind civil courts.
The settlement order, revenue records, and lack of evidence supporting adverse possession claims were crucial in establishing the plaintiffs' continuous possession and defeating the defendants' claim....
The court upheld the admissibility of historical tenancy documents under Section 90 of the Evidence Act, confirming the plaintiffs' rights over the land despite challenges regarding document validity....
The record of rights (Khatian) is presumptive evidence of ownership, establishing Rayati rights until disproved, leading to recovery of possession.
Adverse Possession – Necessary ingredients to constitute adverse possession must be proved in order to perfect title over land.
Adverse Possession – When a possession is sought on the ground of Sada-deed of Dar Raiyat, law of adverse possession is not available.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of documents and the application of the principle of adverse possession in property disputes.
A minor cannot acquire property rights through settlement, and claims must be substantiated by proper documentation to establish title and possession.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
