JUDGMENT:-Four ejectment suits under the Presidency Towns Small Causes Court Act were filed by the different land owners against a common set of tenants, who were given a lease of vacant land and on which they have put up superstructure and who filed petitions under section 9 of the Tamil Nadu City Tenants Protection Act for relief. When these suits were filed 11 petitioners of whom petitioners 4 and 11, who are also defendants 4 and 11 in the ejectment suits were receivers appointed by the High Court in C.S. No. 152 of 1960 on the file of the High Court, Madras. It is common ground that the original lease of the vacant site was in favour of the firm of N. V. Abdullah Sahib. It is also not in dispute that the said firm of which the defendants other than defendant 11 were partners and were conducting the said business put up superstructure of their own even prior to 1954. Due to certain disputes amongst the partners after the death of N.V. Abdullah Sahib, a suit was filed in the High Court, C.S. No. 152 of 1960. It is in that suit defendants 4 and 11 were appointed as joint receivers.. The fourth defendant is a party receiver and defendant 11 is an advocate receiver. In the ejectmen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document