SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Mad) 2531

K.VENKATARAMAN
C. Bagyalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
P. Irulappan & Another – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:For the Petitioner:T.R. Jeyapalan, Advocate. For the Respondents:M.V. Venkataseshan, Advocate.

Judgment :-

1. The present Civil Revision Petition is directed against order of the learned Additional District Munsif, Madurai Town dated 25.8.2005, in I.A. No. 955 of 2004 in O.S. No. 1258 of 1995.

2. The petitioner herein and the 2nd respondent herein filed the Suit in O.S.No.1258 of 1995 against the first respondent herein on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Madurai Town for declaration that they are entitled to the suit property and in consequence, restraining the respondent by means of permanent injunction from interfering with their possession and enjoyment of the Suit property by making further construction. In the said Suit, I.A. No. 955 of 2004 has been filed for withdrawal of the Suit with liberty to institute a fresh Suit in respect of the subject matter of the Suit. The same has been dismissed by the learned Additional District Munsif, Madurai Town and the said order is under in the present Civil Revision Petition.

3. The averments set forth in the affidavit filed in support of the said Application under Order 23, Rule 1(3) and Section 151, C.P.C. for withdrawal of the said Suit are extracted below:

“The respondent/defendant had filed a Written Statement claimi
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top