M.KARPAGAVINAYAGAM
J. Sudharsan And Another – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
The petitioners, claiming themselves as Lawyers by profession, have preferred this revision against the common order passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Chennai in the applications filed by them in Crl.M.P. Nos. 6654 and 7009 of 1997 dated 22-9-1997.
2. The prayer made in Crl.M.P. No. 6654 of 1997 dated 30-8-1997, the petition for Court release, is as follows :-
"No other sentence remains to be completed by the petitioners including the sentences awarded by this Hon'ble Court. No other case pending against the petitioners in any other Court.
It is, therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to depute the concerned Staff member dealing with the release of the petitioners to inform this Hon'ble Court by 2-9-1997 about formalities if any to be completed for granting Court release of the petitioners as prayed for and thus render justice."
3. The prayer made by the petitioners in the memo in Crl.M.P. No 7009 of 1997 dated 11-9-1997 is this :-
"On 27-8-1997 Hon'ble Division Bench of High Court reduced the 3 years sentence of the High Court and granted release to the petitioners arising out of health complications which require
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.