V.KANAGARAJ
Sukra Diamond Tools Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent
KANAKARAJ, J.
These two writ petitions filed by the same petitioner raise an interesting question of law relating to the interpretation of s. 143(1)(a) of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter called "the Act"), r/w s. 143(1A) of the Act. WP No. 7751 of 1994, relates to the levy of additional income-tax for the asst. yr. 1991-92 to the tune of Rs. 2, 36, 096. WP No. 7752 of 1994 relates to the levy of additional income-tax to the tune of Rs. 1, 86, 492 for the asst. yr. 1992-93. In both the cases identical question is raised for consideration.
2. Only a few more facts have to be noticed before plunging into the provisions of law and the interpretation of the same. For the year 1991-92 the petitioner returned a loss of Rs. 48, 09, 661 under s. 143(1)(a) of the Act, the assessing authority disallowed the sum of Rs. 22, 41, 328 and a further sum of Rs. 39, 788 under s. 43B of the Act. The assessing authority intimated to the petitioner that the loss was determined at Rs. 25, 28, 545. He proceeded to levy additional tax under s. 143(1A) to the tune of Rs. 2, 36, 096. Similarly, for the asst. yr. 1992-93, the petitioner returned a loss of Rs. 48, 47, 744. The assessing authority disal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.