B.SUBHASHAN REDDY, K.P.SIVASUBRAMANIAM, K.RAVIRAJA PANDIAN
Minor S. Muthu Senthil, Appellant/Petitioner v. State of T. N. and others, Respondents. And L. Chandrakumar – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of T. N. – Respondent
B. SUBHASHAN REDDY, C. J.:- At issue is the cosntitutionality of the Government action in providing rural reservation for admission to professional courses conducted by the Government and self-financing colleges in the State of Tamil Nadu.
2. Excepting W.P. No. 16595 of 2001 and W.A. No. 2624 of 2001 arising therefrom, which relate to admission to law course, all other writ petitions relate to medical admission. The genesis for this litigation is G.O. No. 603 (Education), dated 30-8-1996, by which a high level committee was appointed to review the standard of education, basic facilities etc. The high level committee had recommended to the Government to reserve 15% of the seats for the students studying in panchayat schools in rural areas. The premise on which such recommendation was made is said to be the disparity in opportunity in securing admissions to professional courses between the students studying in the schools located in rural areas as compared to that of urban areas. According to the high level committee, the students of rural areas were at disadvantaged position than their counter-parts in urban areas. Firstly, such facility of special reservation was made avail
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.