SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(SC) 1213

N.S.HEGDE, V.N.KHARE
Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation – Appellant
Versus
NILAYBHAI R. THAKORE – Respondent


Judgment

SANTOSH HEGDE, J.

( 1 ) LEAVE granted.

( 2 ) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.

( 3 ) BEFORE the High Court of Gujarat, the respondents herein challenged the constitutional validity of Rule 6 (i) and Rule 7 of the Rules for Admission to Smt. N. H. L. Municipal Medical College on the ground that the said Rules which define "the local students" are unreasonable, illegal, illogical, irrational and violative of Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution of India. They further prayed for a writ of mandamus or a writ in the like nature directing the respondents to consider the case of the students who are residing in the limits of Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation and who have passed the qualifying examination from the School (s) situated within the limits of Ahmedabad Urban Development Area (hereinafter referred to as "auda") for admission in the Medical College referred to above as local students. The cause for filing the said writ petition was that Rules 6 and 7 of the said Rules prevented the students who are residents of Ahmedabad city but who had acquired their qualification for admission from the educational institutions situated within the AUDA from being treated as "local s












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top