SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Mad) 145

V.RATNAM
Subbiah – Appellant
Versus
Muthuswamy – Respondent


Advocates:
K. Balasubramanian, for Petitioner, R. Sintha Mathar, for Respondents.

Judgement

ORDER :- In this Civil Revision Petition at the instance of the first defendant in O. S. No. 27 of 1983, District Munsiff's Court, Tirunelveli, the question that arises for consideration is, whether the Court below was right in the view it took that it had no jurisdiction to entertain an application for review filed before it by the petitioner. Originally, the first respondent instituted O. S. No. 217 oaf 1978 before the Sub Court, Tuticorin, against the petitioner and the second respondent herein for the recovery of amounts due under a mortgage dated 29-5-1972. Subsequently, owing to the enlargement of the pecuniary jurisdiction of the District Munsiff's Court, the suit instituted by the first respondent herein fefore the Sub Court, Tuticorin, stood transferred to the file of the District Munsiff's Court, Tuticorin. Before that Court, the first respondent herein prayed in I. A. No. 1293 of 1982 for an amendment of the plaint. Some objections were raised by the petitioner and after overruling those objections, on 15-10-1982, the learned District Munsiff allowed the application for an amendment of the plaint. On 20-12-1982, the suit which was pending before the District Mun










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top