SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Mad) 563

P.S.KAILASAM, N.S.RAMASWAMI
Khader Khan Sahib – Appellant
Versus
Doraiswami Chettiar – Respondent


Judgement

N.S. RAMASWAMI, J. :- The plaintiff in the suit is the appellant before us. The question that arises in this Letters Patent Appeal is whether the plaintiff is entitled to be compensated by the first defendant under Section 70 of the Contract Act. The suit property originally belonged to one Rahmat Bee. She had mortgaged the same to one Abdul Azeez under the deed dated 5-7-1946. One Perumal Udayar, a simple money creditor of Rahamat Bee as well as her husband obtained a decree in O. S. No. 520 of 1952 on the file of the court of the District Munsif, Namakkal and brought the suit property to sale subject to the abovesaid mortgage in favour of Abdul Azeez. In the court auction sale held the first defendant in the present suit, out of which this Letters Patent Appeal arises, purchased the property subject to the mortgage in favour of Abdul Azeez dated 5-7-1946. The said Abdul Azeez brought a suit on his mortgage in O. S. No. 315 of 1958 on the file of the Court of the District Munsif, Namakkal, impleading the first defendant herein also as a party defendant, he having purchased the equity of redemption in the court sale in pursuance of the money decree in O. S. 520 of 1952. Th




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top