SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Mad) 674

M.THANIKACHALAM
A. LO. Gopal Sah, Chennai and others – Appellant
Versus
K. P. M. Musthaffa and others – Respondent


Advocates:
N.Nagu Sha for Petitioners.
V.S.Subramaniyam, for Respondents.

ORDER: The landlords/petitioners in R.C.O.P.No.1212 of 1996 on the file of the VII Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai, though obtained an order of eviction against the tenants, unable to sustain the same, when the same was challenged before the appellate authority and the result is the dismissal of the application, which is challenged in this revision.

2. The revision petitioners are the owners of a non residential premises bearing Door No.262, Purasawalkam High Court, Madras, about 541 sq.ft., comprised in R.S.No.602/2, 603/2 part, new R.S.No.602/3, 602/12. The respondents are in occupation of the same, as tenants, agreeing to pay a monthly rent of Rs.2,200. The third petitioner is carrying on business in sarees in the name and style of Sanjay Sarees Centre in a rental shop at premises No.21, Iyyah Mudali Street, Chindadripet, Madras-2, on a monthly rent of Rs.550. The third petitioner felt it very convenient, to carry on his business, in the rented premises, which is in a narrow street. Therefore, he decided and intended to shift his business, from the rented premises to the premises, owned by the petitioners, since this premises will be suitable for textile business, as it is sit































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top