ORDER: The landlady is the revision petitioner. The landlady, who succeeded before the Rent Controller, but lost before the Appellate Authority, has filed this revision petition.

2. The case of the petitioner in the R.C.O.P. is as follows:

The petition mentioned property belongs to the petitioner. Santhanam Pillai, the father of the respondents, became a tenant under the petitioner on a monthly rent of Rs.12. After the death of Santhanam Pillai, his sons, the respondents, are residing in the petition mentioned property. The respondents were irregular in the payment of rent. The respondent have paid the rent up to Chittirai Rathakshi year. From Vaikasi, the respondents have not paid the rent and have committed wilful default in the payment of rent. The respondents have defaulted to pay ten months rent i.e., Rs.120. The petitioner issued a notice to the second respondent on 25.1.1985 and the same was returned. Therefore, this petition is filed under Sec.10(2)(i) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control Act) 18 of 1960 (in short “the Act”).

3. The case of the respondents is as follows:

The first respondent is the younger brother of the second respondent. The respondents had be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document