K.P.SIVASUBRAMANIAM
K. S. Pandian – Appellant
Versus
G. Rukmani Bai and three others – Respondent
1. This revision is directed against the order of eviction passed as against the revision petitioner/tenant in R.C.A.No.89 of 1991, Sub Court, Madurai, reversing the order of the Rent Controller, Madurai, in R.C.O.P.No.128 of 1984.
2. The respondents have prayed for eviction of the tenant, contending that the premises was taken on lease by the revision petitioner on a monthly rent of Rs.35. The petitioner was always irregular in payment of rent and a notice was sent on 9.12.1997 pointing out the wilful nature of the default in payment of rent. Rents were being sent by money orders. He was unable to take proceedings as he was employed out of Madurai town. Earlier, a sum of Rs.210 was sent claiming to be the rent due for the period March, 1981 to April, 1982. After the said payment, he did not pay any amount. Therefore, rents were due from April, 1982 to the end of January, 1984 namely, for a period of 22 months. A notice dated 9.1.1984 was sent terminating the tenancy which was received by the tenant on 11.1.1984. A reply dated 1.2.1984 was sent with a cheque for Rs.735 which also did not represent the correct amount due as on that date since as on that date, a sum of Rs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.