FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA
M. MahendranaliasNithiya alias Nidhi and others – Appellant
Versus
State represented by Intelligence Officer, Narcotic Control Bureau, South Zone, Chennai – Respondent
2. The above appeals have been preferred against the common judgment of the Special Court under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act hereinafter called as ‘the Act’, Madras in C.C.No.186 of 1994 dated 31.7.1997 convicting A-1 and A-2 under Sec.8(c) read with Sec.21 of the Act and A-2 to A-6 under Sec.8(c) read with Sec.21 and also under Sec.29 of the Act and sentenced them to undergo ten years rigorous imprisonment apart from imposing a fine of Rs.1,00,000 and in default of payment of fine to under rigorous imprisonment for further period of one more year.
3. The case of the prosecution was that on 2.9.1994 around 11.30 a.m., based on intelligence report gathered by P.W.1 to the effect the A-1 residing at Door No.26B Anna Street, Madhavaram, Chennai was in possession of contraband Heroin, that he was attempting to sell the said contraband to others, that after getting necessary permission from his superiors, P.W.1 proceeded along with certain other officials 1
The State of Rajasthan v. Daulat Ram A.I.R. 1980 S.C. 1314
Motilal Padampet Sugar Mills Company (P) Ltd. v. State of U. P. A.I.R. 1979 S.C. 621
Prokash Chandra Dalui v. Biswanath Banerjee A.I.R. 1989 S.C. 1834
Pooran Mal v. Director of Inspection
Haroom Haji Abdulla v. Stats of Maharashtra A.I.R. 1968 S.C. 832
Shankaria v. State of Rajasthan A.I.R. 1978 S.C. 1248
Associated Hotels of India Ltd.
State of Rajasthan v. Daulat Ram A.I.R. 1980 S.C. 1314
Karnal Singh v. State of Rajasthan [2000] 7 S.C.C. 632
State of Maharashtra v. Mohd. Yakub 1980 Crl.L.J. 793. A.I.R. 1980 S.C. 1111
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.