K.GOVINDARAJAN
P. Senniappan and others – Appellant
Versus
Kannammal and others – Respondent
1. The landlords/petitioners aggrieved against the order in appeal, have filed the above revision.
2. The petitioners filed R.C.O.P.No.37 of 1989 on the file of the learned Rent Controller/District Munsif, Erode for eviction of the respondents/tenants under Section 10(2)(ii)(a), 10(2)(ii)(b) and 10(3)(a)(iii) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 18 of 1960. According to the petitioners, the premises in question originally belonged to one Mrs.V.K. Nagarathinammal and the petitioners purchased the entire premises under two sale deeds dated 14. 1989. The first respondent was a tenant under the petitioners vendor. She took the premises for the purpose of running textile business. It is claimed by the petitioners that the tenancy was attorned by the first respondent and so she has become the tenant under the petitioners.
3. According to the petitioners, the first petitioner is doing business in textiles for the past 12 years under the name and style of Banu Radha Textiles in a rented premises in Door No.4 Kamaraj Street, Erode. The second petitioner is also doing business in textiles under the name and style of Sivan Textiles in a rented building at Doo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.