S.S.SUBRAMANI
Arumugha Chettiar – Appellant
Versus
Jayaraman – Respondent
R.C.O.P. No.19 of 1985 on the file of District Munsif, Cuddalore, was filed by the petitioner herein, for eviction of the respondent on the ground that the non-residential building, which is the subject matter of the proceeding, is bona fide required for his own occupation and also on the ground that the building requires demolition and reconstruction.
2. It is alleged by the petitioner that as per Ex.A-23 partition deed in his family, he obtained ownership over the scheduled property. The respondent herein was the tenant under his father, and, after the petitioner became the landlord, the tenancy has been attorned to him. The rate of rent is Rs.75 per month.
3. The petitioner contended that himself, his father and other members of the family were conducting jewellery business and the petitioner had experience in conducting jewellery shop. He wants to open a showroom in the scheduled building for which he has requested permission from the concerned authorities. He has also applied before the Assistant Collector, Customs, for getting licence, and he has deposited necessary amount for the said purpose. He has also sought for licence for conducting a shop. But, since no b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.