In all these revisions arising under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, landlords are the revision petitioners.

2. Except in C.R.P. No.2677 of 1989, the findings of the authorities below are concurrent, against the landlords. In C.R.P. No.2677 of 1989, Rent Controller found that the claim of the landlords is bona fide and that they require the building for their own occupation. When the matter was taken in appeal, the appellate authority, in view of its judgment in the appeals which are the subject-matter of revision in C.R.P. Nos.2674, 2675 and 2676 of 1969, allowed the appeal and dismissed the claim. Hence, the revision petitions by the landlords.

3. In all these cases, a common question arises, i.e., whether the building is required bona fide, for the own occupation of the landlords. Even though separate eviction petitions have been filed, tenants are in occupation of portions of the same structure having single room tenements, for residential purpose.

4. It is the cause of the landlords that they have no other building of their own, and in the site in which the schedule buildings are situated, they are going to put up a new construction for the