Common Order:

This order shall govern all the above seven revision petitions.

2. The unsuccessful tenants, three in number, who have suffered an order of eviction in the three RCOPs filed by the respondent-landlady in RCOP Nos.439, 440 and 441 of 2003, and whose appeals in RCA Nos.788, 789 and 790 of 2004 have failed, have brought forth three revisions in CRP Nos.36, 37 and 38 of 2006 respectively.

3. Equally, on dismissal of the three RCOPs filed by the tenants for deposit of rental arrears under Sec.8(5) of the Act in RCOP Nos.1037, 1038 and 1039 of 2003, they preferred three appeals in RCA Nos.798, 799 and 800 of 2004, and on dismissal of the same, they have brought forth the other three revisions in CRP Nos.39, 40 and 41 of 2006 respectively.

4. The landlady filed another petition in RCOP No.1370 of 2002 against the tenant who is actually shown as the respondent in RCOP No.440/2003, seeking eviction on the grounds of personal use and occupation and additional accommodation, and the said petition was ordered. Aggrieved, the said tenant took it on appeal in RCA No.1325 of 2004, and on its failure, she brought forth CRP No.42/2006.

5. The respondent-landlady filed t