SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Mad) 2502

CHITRA VENKATARAMAN
Ansar Basha – Appellant
Versus
Mohamed Abdul Khadir & Another – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Sirajudeen, Advocate. For the Respondents:J. Sudhakaran, Advocate.

Judgment :-

1. The prayer in the Suit is for compensation of a sum of Rs.55,00,000/- in respect of the proceedings taken against the plaintiff in the Criminal Court, resulting in acquittal.

2. The Suit is opposed by the respondents herein on the ground that the filing of the Suit is barred by limitation as per Article 74 of the Limitation Act, which prescribes only one year limitation from the date of acquittal.

3. The facts leading to the filing of the Suit are as follows: The plaintiff is working as a selection grade lecturer in the Department of Commerce in Quaide Milleth College, Medavakkam, Chennai and the defendants are also working in the same college. It is stated that the plaintiff along with 20 other staff members of the college were prosecuted in two Criminal Complaints preferred by the defendants before the Judicial Magistrate, Alandur, Chennai, which were taken up on file in C.C. No.144 of 2001 and 147 of 2001 respectively. The plaintiff was impleaded as 18th accused in both the Complaints. Ultimately, by order-dated 17. 2005, the Complaints were rejected and the plaintiff was acquitted. The plaintiff submits that he was forced to spend his valuable time in attending












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top