R.BANUMATHI, FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA
Thervoy Gramam Munnetra Nala Sangam (Reg. No. 87/09), Rep. by its Secretary K. Dhanraj Thiruvallur District – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India, rep. by the Secretary to Government, Ministry of Environment & Forests New Delhi & Others – Respondent
R. Banumathi, J
Writ Petition has been filed to quash G.O.Ms.No.650 Revenue Department dated 111. 2008 transferring/assigning the lands comprised in S.Nos.32/2 and 33/2 in Thervoy kandigai village, Gummidipoondi Block, Tiruvallur District to the 7th Respondent and from changing the use of such land from Meikkal poramboke to any other use.
2. Brief facts which led to the filing of Writ Petition is as follows:-
(i) 250 Hectares in S.Nos.32/2 and 33/2 was classified as Meikkal poramboke. Government decided to form an Industrial park in the said lands and issued notice on 11. 2007 regarding transfer of lands. Thervoy panchayat had passed resolution on 30.1.2007 consenting for the transfer of the above lands to State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu [SIPCOT]. As per G.O.Ms.650 Revenue department dated 111. 2008, Government alienated an extent of 250 hectares of grazing ground poramboke lands comprised in S.Nos.32/2 and 33/2 of Thervoy village for establishment of second Industrial complex in Tiruvallur District to be transferred to the name of SIPCOT subject to certain conditions. Petitioner association claims to have been formed working for the benefit of resid
2005 (40 CTC 1 [L.Krishnan v. State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary
2006 (6) SCC 543 [Susetha v. State of T.N. and others]
2008-4-LW-220 [K.Balamurugan & 7 others v. The State of Tamil Nadu
2009 AIR SCW 4623 [Meerut Development Authority v. Association of Management
Chhetriya Pradushan Mukti Sangharsh Samitis case [AIR 1990 SC 2060]
1996 (5) SCC 647 [Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India and others]
Samatha v. State of A.P. [(1997) 8 SCC 191]
2006 (6) SCC 543 [Susetha v. State of T.N. and others]
2006 (6) SCC 371 [Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board v. C.Kenchappa and
Subhas Kumar v. State of Bihar [(1991) 1 SCC 598 : AIR 1991 SC 420]
Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India [(2000) 10 SCC 664]
(1997) 2 SCC 267 [TN.Godavarman Thirumulkpad v. Union of India and others]
(2000) 2 SCC 599 [Consumer Education & research Society v. Union of India and
(1990) 2 SCC 352 [Hindi Hitrakashak Samitiand others v. Union of India and others]
(1997) 2 SCC 87 [S.Jagannath v. Union of India and others]
Nottinghamshire Country Council v. Secretary of State for the Environment [(1986) 1 All
A.P.Pollution Control Board (II) v. Prof. M.V.Nayudu [(2001) 2 SCC 62
M.C.Mehta v. Union of India [(1991) 2 SCC 137]
(2004) 2 SCC 392 [Essar Oil Limited v. Halar Utkarsh Samit]
AIR 2006 SC 2038 [Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board v. C.Kenchappa &
AIR 2006 SC 2050 [Nayini Narasimha Reddy v. Dr.K.Laxman & others]
[Vengaivasal Village Panchayat by its President v. The State of
Revenue (Land Development), Fort St. George
2006 (6) SCC 371 [Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board v. C.Kenchappa and
Secretary, Environment and Forest Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George
1994 (6) SCC 651 [Tata Cellular v. UOI]
Maneka Gandhis case [AIR 1978 SC 597]
Animal and Environment Legal Defence Fund v. Union of India
2004 (9) SCC 362 [N.D.Jayal and another v. Union of Indian and others]
[State of H.P. v. Ganesh Wood Products (1995) 6 SCC 363
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.