SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, M.VENUGOPAL
R. Amirthaveni & Another – Appellant
Versus
The District Employment Exchange Officer & Others – Respondent
S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.
In both these Writ Petitions, as common question of law is involved, they were heard together and disposed of by this common order.
2. The Principal District and Sessions Judge of Thiruvallur, with a view to take steps to fill up different ministerial posts, such as Examiner of Copies, Reader, Copyist, Senior Bailiff, Office Assistant, Masalchi, Watchman, Xerox Operator, Driver, etc., took steps and called for the names from the District Employment Office of Thiruvallur. In spite of different requests, including oral request, only some names were forwarded in piecemeal and not for all the posts. The aforesaid matter was referred to by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thiruvallur, to this Court, vide D.No.3296/A/2007, dated 38. 2007 / 09. 2007. Similar problem having been faced, the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Madurai, vide his D.No.12393, dated 20.9.2007, referred the matter to this Court in its administrative side and pointed out the vacancy position. It is informed that for the post of Steno-Typist, the Employment Exchange was requested to send the list of candidates and the District Employment Office, Madurai, has addressed a
2. Excise Superintendent vs. K.B.N. Visweshwara Rao
3. Arun Tewari vs. Zila Mansavi Shikshak Sangh
4. UPSC vs. Girish Jayanti Lal Vaghela
5. Secy., State of Karnataka vs. Umadevi (3)
6. Principal, Mehar Chand Polytechnic vs. Anu Lamba
7. Arun Kumar Nayak vs. Union of India
9. Rabindra Nath Mahata vs. State of West Bengal
10. Sivakumari, R. vs. Ramanathapuram Mavatta Payirchipetra Edainilai Asiriyargal Sangam
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.