M.VENUGOPAL
A. Gurunathan @ Sivaji – Appellant
Versus
J. Muthulakshmi & Others – Respondent
1. The revision petitioner/petitioner/94th defendant has filed this civil revision petition as against the orders dated 14. 2008 in I.A.No.130 of 2008 in O.S.No.74 of 2007 passed by the Additional District Judge and Fast Track Court No.1, Erode in dismissing the application filed by the revision petitioner herein praying to reject the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11(c) and Section 151 of CPC.
2. The trial Court, while passing order in I.A.No.130 of 2008 has inter alia opined that without filing the application under Section 149 of CPC praying to condone the delay in regard to the payment of deficit Court Fee, the act of receiving the Court Fee by the Court is an irregular one but the same is not illegal and resultantly dismissed the application.
3. The learned senior counsel for the revision petitioner contends that the order of the trial Court in dismissing I.A.No.130 of 2008 is contrary to law and that the trial Court has failed to note that it erred in law in extending the time for payment of Court Fee without any application being filed for such extension and moreover the extension of time for payment of Court Fee is not an automatic and that when the payment of Court
7. Venugopal Pillai -vs- Thirugnanavalli Ammal AIR 1940 Madras 934
10. Mahanth Ram -vs- Ganga Das AIR 1961 Supreme Court 882
11. Durairangam Pillai -vs- Govindarajulu Naidu AIR 1938 Madras 560
12. Garapati Venkanna-vs- Mullapudi Atchutaramanna 1938 MLJ 610 at 611
114. Jugal Kishore-vs- Dhanno Devi(dead) By Lrs. AIR 1973 Supreme Court 2508 at 2509
1. Ramiah -v- R.Palaniappan 2007(5) MLJ 559 at 563
221. Ganapathy Hedge -vs- Krishnakudva (2005)13 Supreme Court Cases 539 at 540
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.