R.JAYASIMHA BABU, PRABHA SRIDEVAN
Arunachala Mudaliar – Appellant
Versus
Jayalakshmi Ammal – Respondent
Prabha Sridevan, J.
1. The second respondent/first defendant owned the suit property. The appellant / second defendant claims to have purchased the property bona fide on 22.4.1982. Ex-B4 is the sale deed and Ex-B5 is the sale agreement dated 25.11.1981 that is said to have preceded it. On the other hand, the first respondent/plaintiff claims to be entitled to specific performance of the sale agreement Ex-A7 dated 6.2.1982, between her and the first defendant. The first defendant after filing the written statement remained ex parte . The Trial Court dismissed the suit. On appeal, the learned Single Judge granted a decree.
2. According to the plaint, on 3.8.1981, an agreement was entered into between the first defendant and the husband of the plaintiff for conveying the suit property for a price of Rs.24,410. A notice dated 1.1.1982 was issued by the plaintiff's husband and a suit was filed. Other suits for injunction and other reliefs were filed by the parties herein against each other. To purchase peace, a Panchayat was convened and the well-wishers of the village persuaded the plaintiff and the first defendant to cancel the agreement dated 3.8.1981 and to enter into a f
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.