SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Mad) 92

R.S.RAMANATHAN
Munusamy – Appellant
Versus
Vengadachalam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants:V. Raghavachari, Advocate.
For the Respondents:R1, K. Surendranath, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :-

1. Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal against the judgment and decree of the Principal Sub Judge, Pondicherry dated 25.10.2010 in A.S.No.34 of 2008 confirming the judgment and decree dated 17.11.2008 in E.A.No.240 of 2001 in E.P.No.185 of 2000 in O.S.No.460 of 1982 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif, Pondicherry. Respondents 2 to 6 in E.A.No.240 of 2001 in E.P.No.185 of 2000 in O.S.No.460 of 1982 on the file of the III Additional District Munsif, Puducherry are the appellants in this civil miscellaneous second appeal.

2. The suit in O.S.No.460 of 1982 was filed by the first respondent herein against one Gundu Govindasamy for declaration of his title and possession of three pieces of immovable property and the suit was decreed. As per the decree, the defendant viz., Gundu Govindasamy was directed to hand over vacant possession of the encroached portion, marked as 'A' 'B' and 'C' in Ex.C2 the surveyor's sketch, to the plaintiff. The said judgment debtor filed appeal in A.S.No.104 of 1988 challenging the judgment and decree before the Principal District Judge, Pondicherry and that appeal was dismissed and in Second Appeal No.1389 of 1989 filed by the judgment de






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top