1. The unsuccessful plaintiff, who is not able to get possession of the property even though his suit for recovery of possession was decreed and confirmed by this court in the Second Appeal, is the revision petitioner.

2. The revision petitioner filed O.S.No.2684 of 1996 for delivery of possession of the property, for damages and for future mesne profits. Originally, the suit was filed by the revision petitioner in this court in C.S.No.216 of 1984 against the 1st respondent only and thereafter, two other defendants were impleaded at the instance of the first respondent herein and the suit was transferred to the City Civil Court and renumbered as O.S.No.2684 of 1996 and the prayer was amended to the effect that the defendants are to be directed to deliver vacant possession of the suit property and for damages.

3. The averments in the plaint filed by the revision petitioner was that on 23.5.1968, he entered into an agreement of sale with defendants 2 and 3 and as per the agreement, defendants 2 and 3 agreed to purchase the property. The property was allotted to the revision petitioner by the City Improvement Trust. Defendants 2 and 3 filed O.S.No.3069 of 1976 on the file o