K.VENKATARAMAN
Lakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Prasanna Mani – Respondent
1. The present Civil Revision Petition is filed to strike out the plaint in O.S.No.281 of 2010 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Coimbatore.
2. The first defendant in the said suit has filed the present Civil Revision Petition.
3. The short facts which requires for the disposal of the present Civil Revision Petition are set out here under:-
One Nachimuthu Chettiar was the owner of the joint family properties in S.F.No.514 at Sulur Village. He had a son and five daughters. One of the daughters, filed a suit in O.S.No.201 of 1982 against her father, brother Tirumalaisamy and other daughters. A preliminary decree was passed on 22/3/1982.
4. The first respondent herein who was the plaintiff in O.S.No.281 of 2010 which is sought to be struck of in this revision, has filed an application in I.A.No.399 of 1996 along with her purchasers to implead them as parties to the suit in O.S.No.201 of 1982. Her claim was that she is the wife of late Tirumalaisamy. The said application was dismissed by an order dated 13/6/1997 by the learned District Munsif, Coimbatore District. A revision has been filed against the said order in CRP (NPD) No.2146 of 1999 and the same was also dis
5. 2005 7 SCC – 510 ((POPAT AND KOTECHA PROPERTY Vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA STAFF ASSOCIATION)
2. KONERIDOSS Vs. N. SUBBIAH NAIDU AND OTHERS reported in AIR 1975 MADRAS 124.
10. K.K.MODI Vs. K.N.MODI AND OTHERS reported in (1998) 3 S.C.C. 573.
12. Kishore Kumar Khaitan v. Praveen Kumar Singh
1. KRISHNAKUMAR Vs. N. GOVERDHANA NAIDU AND ANOTHER reported in AIR 1975 MADRAS 174
9. COMMISSIONER AND SPECIAL OFFICER
13. MUNIAPPA NADAR AND OTHERS Vs. K.V.DORAIPANDI NADAR AND ANOTHER reported in AIR 1988 MADRAS 117.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.