V.PERIYA KARUPPIAH
P. Mahendran – Appellant
Versus
S. Jothilakshmi – Respondent
1. This revision is directed against the judgment and decree passed in RCA.No.9 of 2009 and the fair and executable order passed in M.P.No.567 of 2009 dated 02.08.2010 in directing the eviction of the revision petitioner on the ground of requirement of premises under additional accommodation.
2. The brief facts of the case of the petitioner / landlady before the Rent Controller are as follows:-
The petitioner purchased the petition premises from one Tmt.Vijaya Govindarajan on 09.02.2007 under registered sale deed along with the adjacent portion. The respondent was tenant under the erstwhile owner on a monthly rent of Rs.950/- excluding consumption charges for residential purpose. The petitioner and her vendor informed the respondent to vacate the petition premises on or before 31.01.2007. The respondent stated that he could vacate only in May 2007. He assured that he would pay monthly rent to the petitioner from the date of sale deed and would also vacate by end of May 2007. Thus, the respondent attorned tenancy orally to the petitioner. However, the respondent failed to pay monthly rent from 09.02.2007 to the petitioner in spite of repeated demands and notice dated 06.0
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.