SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Mad) 244

RAMASWAMI
In re Annamalai Mudaliar – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.R. Raghavachari, for Petitioner; Govt. Pleader, for the State.

Judgement

ORDER : - This S.R. is sought to be filed as a Civil Revision Petition against the order dated 15-10-1951, in the nature of an award, passed by the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Tiruvannamalai, in C.L. No.920/50-51.

2. The High Court Office thereupon took two objections viz., that this Civil Revision petition has not been filed within 90 days of the date of the order and secondly, that it does not appear that a civil revision petition of this nature can be preferred on the foot of Article 227, Constitution of India.

3. Taking the first point, there is a delay of 8 days and the learned advocate is directed to file a formal petition for excusing the delay and orders will be passed excusing the delay. This aspect of the case need not detain us further.

4. The maintainability of this S.R.as a civil revision petition depends upon the decision whether it would be open to the High Court to revise the order. Under S.51(8)(a) of Madras Act 8 of 1932 any decision passed by the Registrar under cl.(a) of sub-S.(2) or under sub-S.(5) shall be final and shall not be called in question in any civil or revenue Court. Section 57 prescribes a revision to the local Government or t















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top