RAMASWAMI
The Public Prosecutor – Appellant
Versus
India China Lingiah and others – Respondent
JUDGMENT :- This is an appeal preferred by the State against the order of acquittal by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Kandukuru in C. C. No. 38 of 1951.
2. The facts are : On the night of 24-4-1950 at Ayyanakota there was house-breaking by night and theft in the house of P.W. 1 Venkatasubbiah. This burglary was discovered by him the next morning. It was then found that the big wooden chest or Bhoshanam box had been broken open and the boxes M.O. 1 belonging to P.W. 1 and M.O. 2 belonging to the son-in-law of P.W. 1 viz., P.W. 2 and 3 boxes M.Os. 3 to 5 belonging to P.W. 3 and valuable jewellery and clothing of the family of P.W. 1 and the clothes left for safe custody by some shepherds had been removed from that Bhoshanam Box. P.W. 1 found 3 or 4 chains away from his house some of these opened boxes which he identified as those kept in the chest. Then P.W. 1 went to inform the Triune Officer P.W. 6 who was in the field who visited the scene of offence and got a report Ex. P1 made out in the hand-writing of P.W. 2 and which has been signed by P.W. 1. P.W. 6 then sent the usual reports to the Police and the Magistracy. P.W. 12, the Sub-Inspector of Police, Pamur, reached the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.