The revision petitioner/6th Respondent/6th defendant, has filed this civil revision petition as against the order in I.A.No.727 of 2006 in O.S.No.410 of 2004 passed by the learned First Additional Subordinate Judge, Madurai, in allowing the application filed by the first respondent/petitioner/plaintiff praying for the relief of temporary injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

2. The trial Court while passing orders in I.A.No.727 of 2006, has inter alia observed that the first respondent/petitioner/plaintiffs prayer for the relief of temporary injunction restraining the further proceedings to be initiated by the 6th respondent/Bank till the disposal of the main suit is to be granted and resultantly, has allowed the application without costs.

3. The learned Counsel for the revision petitioner/6th Respondent/6th defendant, submits that the trial Court ought to have dismissed the injunction application in I.A.No.727 of 2006 in O.S.No.410 of 2004 on the file of the trial Court and that the trial Court has failed to take note of the ingredients of Section 13(2) and Section 13(4) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Finan