SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Mad) 4877

R.S.RAMANATHAN
S. Saravanan – Appellant
Versus
Deepa – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:R. Thiyagarajan (Senior Counsel) for M. Muthappan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:V. Balu, Advocate.

Judgment :-

1. The respondent in O.P.No.1417 of 2008 on the file of Principal Family Court, Chennai, is the revision petitioner.

2. The respondent herein filed O.P.No.1417 of 2008 before the Principal Family Court against the revision petitioner for restitution of conjugal rights and in that application, the revision petitioner filed I.A.No.2030 of 2009 to decide the maintainability of the O.P.No.1417 of 2008 as a preliminary issue, in view of the divorce decree granted earlier in favour of the revision petitioner herein and that application was dismissed by the Principal Family Court Judge and aggrieved by the same this revision is filed.

3. The case of the revision petitioner is that the respondent was his wife and he filed application for dissolution of marriage in Case No.1-05-FL-125461 before the Superior Court of California to dissolve the marriage between him and the respondent herein and as there was no appearance for the respondent before the Superior Court of California despite service of summons that Court passed an order of dissolution of marriage on the ground of irreconcilable differences and therefore, the marriage between the petitioner and respondent was already dis

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top