S.S.SUBRAMANI
Venugapal – Appellant
Versus
Fathima Beevi – Respondent
1. All these Revisions are by tenants occupying portions of the main structure.
2. Landlords sought eviction of various occupants on the ground that the building requires immediate deolition and reconstruction.
3. The Rent Control Court dismissed the petitions, but the same was reverised by the Appellate Authority. The legality of the judgment of the Appellate Authority is challenged in these Revisions.
4. The material averments in all the eviction petitions are the same, except regarding the rate of rent with which we are not concerned in these Revisions.
5. Regarding the requirement for demolition and reconstruction, the case put forward by the landlords is that there is a multi-storeyed building, the front portion of which is roofed with Madras Terrace and the rear portion is Madras Terrace and Mangalore titled. The building is constructed with brick and lime and plastered with cement, and country wood is used throughout. It is further said that the entire building has developed cracks and in the northern and eastern portion the parent wall has gone out of shape and is sagging. There are horizontal crevices and vertical crevices on the facade of the building and in t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.